funsec mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:21:26 +0100 (BST)
I'm not sure how women don't have equal protection under the law, but that's aside the point. In reality, when the USSC generally discusses companies as having "rights" they are or should be referring to the stock holders' rights - not the corporate entity's. Our political
I have a feeling that under US law, a corporation is a legal "person", there was some railraod case that set this precedent.
systems is not "based" on money either, it seems that way and often works as if it were, but it isn't. Unfortunately *WE* don't appear to be disgusted enough to change the way it looks...yet. Finally, any "commercial free speech" there may be would have to protect spamhaus customers equally - meaning they have the right to enlist the services of spamhaus. I have the ability to block television stations using a government required chip in my TV, and I have the ability to hire someone to filter my e-mail. Spamhaus has the right to say so-and-so is a spammer and if they believe they're being libeled they have the right to sue. That's how this system works. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Fergie (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE:Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Randall M (Sep 16)
- RE: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Gary Funck (Sep 16)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 16)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Brian Loe (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Paul Vixie (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Brian Loe (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Paul Vixie (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Brian Loe (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Drsolly (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Drsolly (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Blue Boar (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Blue Boar (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 19)
- RE: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Gary Funck (Sep 16)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)