Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

[Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Dude VanWinkle wrote:

> On 9/18/06, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:
> > > I'm not sure how women don't have equal protection under the law, but
> > > that's aside the point. In reality, when the USSC generally discusses
> > > companies as having "rights" they are or should be referring to the
> > > stock holders' rights - not the corporate entity's. Our political
> >
> > I have a feeling that under US law, a corporation is a legal "person",
> > there was some railraod case that set this precedent.
>
> Yep, they have most of the rights of a person, but no body with which
> to put in jail when they break the law :-(
 
Yes, that's a drawback. But if a corporation breaks the law, surely at 
least one of the corporate officers has broken the law?

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.