Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 9/18/06, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure how women don't have equal protection under the law, but
> > that's aside the point. In reality, when the USSC generally discusses
> > companies as having "rights" they are or should be referring to the
> > stock holders' rights - not the corporate entity's. Our political
>
> I have a feeling that under US law, a corporation is a legal "person",
> there was some railraod case that set this precedent.

Yep, they have most of the rights of a person, but no body with which
to put in jail when they break the law :-(

-JP
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.