Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 9/18/06, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:30:11 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
>
> > Getting back to the thread though: Vixie said:
> >
> >
> > "last but not least, i want steve linford to be welcome at NANOG and IETF
> > meetings held in the US (and even those held in indiana, if ever.)  having
> > him taken from the airport in handcuffs would be a real buzz-killer for me."
> >
> > Is that a possibility? Did Spamhaus break the law by not being in the
> > courts jurisdiction?
>
> Adobe.  ROT-13. Skylarov. DMCA.

You mean this guy http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-530420.html ?

holy crap! If its even possible, I dislike adobe even more than before
I read the article.

If a stanford law professor says you are innocent, and the DMCA keeps
you in jail, I would call that definitive proof that cash runs our
legal system.

-JP<and to make this post fun
:http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/18/bush.game/ >
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.