Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

[Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>]

Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> The single worst part of that whole thing was that it set a precident that
> ROT-13 was considered an "effective" protection device.  (And yes, 17 USC 2511
> specifically addresses "bypassing an effective copy protection device").

As stupid as that (ROT13) is, you have to remember that in the DRM 
sense, there is no "effective" protection device.  Doesn't matter how 
complicated it is.  You cannot hand me a system that is designed to give 
me access to copyrighted data that does not give me access.

                                                BB
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.