funsec mailing list archives
RE: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:32:31 +0100 (BST)
Now I understand why the villains never just kill the heros, they devise complex schemes that take a long time ... and never work. On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 Blanchard_Michael () emc com wrote:
Forget the chemical recation.... I'll use an explosive, about the size of an M-80 (my poison), strapped to his jugular, that is on a timer for 120 minutes or if it's removed from his neck without the key (his antidote) being inserted, which I have..... Michael P. Blanchard Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE Office of Information Security & Risk Management EMC ² Corporation 4400 Computer Dr. Westboro, MA 01580 -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 1:36 AM To: C Q Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Microsoft shutters Windows private folders On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:58:55 EDT, C Q said:Chemical reactions can be timed pretty well (well, at least some of them).Under controlled conditions. It's a pretty sucky time to find out he's on Coumadin (a particularly touchy medication that's a pain in the ass to get the dosage right), and the next thing you know, he bleeds out on you. If you're a chemistry buff, then you know that most reactions don't go linearly, they're exponential based on concentration - and 2 hours out is a *long* way out the tail either way, whether it's a fast reaction, or a slow one. Go ahead - see if you can make a reaction go in your basement lab, given the uncertainty you'll encounter in the initial conditions (for starters, what's the target's blood volume, to within 1% or so?) Let me know if you can actually get something that's *predictably* stable in lethality at the 2 hour mark, with less than 10 minutes error, across all the variance you might encounter. And oh by the way, the victim has to still be functional for the vast majority of the time - it doesn't help if he passes out or has a seizure or is too busy trying to barf up a lung to be able to tell you the information. It's not that easy in real life, as opposed to a James Bond movie. It's a lot easier to just have a big-ass hourglass, turn it over, and say "If we don't get a verified correct answer before the sand runs out, you get a 9mm between the eyes". Psychologically more effective and likely to produce results too. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders C Q (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders C Q (Jul 17)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 17)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Drsolly (Jul 17)
- R: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Cornali Remo (Jul 18)
- Re: R: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Drsolly (Jul 19)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Andrew (Jul 18)
- RE: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Blanchard_Michael (Jul 18)
- RE: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Drsolly (Jul 19)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Brian Loe (Jul 19)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 19)
- Re: Microsoft shutters Windows private folders Michael Simpson (Jul 18)