RE: cc: "too beautiful not to share"

["Brian Azzopardi" <brian () gfi com>]

> Remember when that guy in England threw an egg at Clinton? I
> completely understood him doing it - and I was totally against him
> being able to. It was low-class - and emotional response to an
> intellectual issue, same as booing.

When does it stop being low-class? At which point do you draw the line?


> The ignorant masses, it would seem, prefer to remain ignorant and
> therefore impotent.

Maybe that's why people should be allowed an 'emotional' response -
they're too stupid to come up with a coherent intellectual argument.
Unlike you I presume.

It's not as if most political campaigns are won by force of argument;
the current, and most expensive ever, US campaign is a testament to
that.


Brian Azzopardi


-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Brian Loe
Sent: 11 October 2007 01:38
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; SDALAN04 () smumn edu
Subject: Re: cc: [funsec] "too beautiful not to share"

On 10/10/07, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

> > be an idiot. AND, if it weren't for this booing and yelling down
there
> > wouldn't be these "special" place for you people in the first place.
>
> If there was no dissent, we'd not need a special place for dissenters.
>
> What a truly scary thought.

My response to your first response is the same as for this: you can
dissent, but doing it to the point where you drown out your opponent
and everyone else, is not protected speech of any kind. It makes you
not a "dissenter" but a public nuisance.

Yankee Stadium is not a forum for political debate anyway so why boo?
Because you're low-class, that's why.

Remember when that guy in England threw an egg at Clinton? I
completely understood him doing it - and I was totally against him
being able to. It was low-class - and emotional response to an
intellectual issue, same as booing.

The ignorant masses, it would seem, prefer to remain ignorant and
therefore impotent. And yet you wonder why a "dumb" President can out
smart you and why electing your party doesn't get you what you
want...must be bliss.

<Nick, for a brainy guy you sure stoop to the lowest forms of online
communication...sniping...sheesh...loser>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this electronic mail may be confidential or
legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient(s) only. Should you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
this mail. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those
of the individual sender and not of GFI. Unauthorized use of the
contents is strictly prohibited. While all care has been taken, GFI is
not responsible for the integrity of the contents of this electronic
mail and any attachments included within.  

This mail was checked for viruses by GFI MailSecurity. 
GFI also develops anti-spam software (GFI MailEssentials), a fax server (GFI FAXmaker), and network security and 
management software (GFI LANguard) - www.gfi.com 



_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.