funsec mailing list archives

Re: Mutually Assured DDoS


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:35:20 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alex Lanstein <ALanstein () fireeye com>
wrote:

Idiocy.
- - ferg

Which part are you against?  The "botnet" angle or the NetA initiative
all together?  I don't see any reason our military shouldn't research
that angle of warfare... anything to keep our guys from getting killed
out there is good in my book.


The botnet DDoS "collateral damage" idiocy.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFJ+2sRq1pz9mNUZTMRAm6SAJoCDwHRpjvWSCoZN1MoVQHWB/20GwCfQidJ
SoWbfIKxP86rCkwGXsXD0BE=
=Q4N7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: