funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mutually Assured DDoS
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:14:36 -0700
Defense, on the modern mechanized air-land battlefield, is more about channeling attackers, or choosing the ground on which engagements take place, than the static "defense" of the Napoleonic and pre-blitzkrieg wars. That very definitely DOES have a parallel in cyberdefense. And I disagree that offense, especially as a counterpunch, is something that is off-limit to respectable actors. If I can detect and own a botnet that is attacking me, and reverse it on its herders, I think that is a highly respectable thing to do.
-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 6:32 AM To: Gadi Evron; Gary Warner Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Mutually Assured DDoSTo be clear, I don't hold the view that Clausewitz is right whenlooking at the Internet... I guess I'm with you on this. But no matter which side he took I don't see why principles like that should be so universal that they should apply to network attacks as well as conventional human warfare. My impression from what I've seen of the private wars we've had on the Internet so far is that defense is possible, but expensive and disadvantaged. The battleground was designed (unintentionally) for offense. On the other hand, offense as a defensive counterpart, what Dempsey would call a counterpunch, is not available to respectable actors, so we've never really seen it tested in earnest. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS, (continued)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Paul M. Moriarty (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gary Warner (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Larry Seltzer (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Tomas L. Byrnes (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS der Mouse (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 04)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Barry Raveendran Greene (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS Rich Kulawiec (May 02)
- Re: Mutually Assured DDoS nameless (May 02)