Re: Sandy Hook

["Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)" <michael.blanchard () emc com>]

Exactly...   Llike this maggot that shot the school....  If he didn't shoot himself, he would have spent the rest of 
his life in prison....
  Even though, there isn't a shadow of a doubt he is the killer.

  Cases like that should be automatic death....   Might I even say, death by the method the victim's family chooses 
too!  Even if that is death by fireants...  His victims didn't have a choice, why should these maggots have any choice 
in the matter....  Again, for zero doubt, multiple witnesses killings....  Others we can try in a court, but then still 
get death if found guilty....

  Hell, bring back public town square hangings...  What more of a deterrent there is than that?

 Mike B

  Mike B

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:noloader () gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 05:39 PM
To: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org <funsec () linuxbox org>
Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)
<michael.blanchard () emc com> wrote:
> Oh, but I do not disagree that police officers and others similiar (doctors
> too) should undergo pych evals as part of the application process... Not
> because of the gun they carry, but because of people in general will look up
> to and look to these people for advise andwell being... They can cause much
> more harm with words than guns ever will....
Absolutely.

I'm not a fan of the Death Penalty, but I could never understand why
there are not laws that automatically trigger the sentence for public
officials and servants (similar to what we have with criminals).
Remember, this is supposed to be a good deterrent. It might of helped
with, for example, Antoinette Frank.

Jeff

> From: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 05:27 PM
> To: 'joel.esler () me com' <joel.esler () me com>; 'noloader () gmail com'
> <noloader () gmail com>
> Cc: 'funsec () linuxbox org' <funsec () linuxbox org>
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook
>
> I would feel that doctors, lawyers, train/bus drivers, truck drivers, etc
> would all have to undergo the same psych eval.... As they ALL cause more
> deaths per year than gun owners........and we can't forget automobile
> drivers too!
>
> Mike B
>
> From: Joel Esler [mailto:joel.esler () me com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 09:41 AM
> To: noloader () gmail com <noloader () gmail com>
> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org <funsec () linuxbox org>
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook
>
> They do. At least all the family members I have that are cops have had
> to/have to.
>
> --
> Joel Esler
> Sent from my iPhone 
>
> On Dec 14, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2012 14:57, Dan White wrote:
>
>
> ....
>
>
> It may be a bit easier for me in Oklahoma to find the crazy people, since
>
> a law allowing citizens to openly carry handguns has recently gone into
>
> effect. I can say, without hesitation, that the average private citizen
>
> openly carrying a firearm is going to be a great deal crazier than the
>
> average citizen.
>
> Would that include off-duty police officers?
>
> I've always argued folks given a gun for a living should have to go
> through psychological evaluation and maintain good mental health. New
> Orleans and Baltimore police departments are a case study.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.