Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof:

From: belal () sco COM (Bela Lubkin)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 1994 22:55:44 -0800


Christopher Klaus wrote:

I think I would take the time to install a patch that has been fully
disclosed and know that most no-brain wannabe hackers are going to be
trying it on my system, versus a patch that fixes a problem that only SCO
and CERT know about and I will probably never have a problem with.


This is ridiculous.  You'd decline to install a security patch because
you think not enough hackers know about the hole?

Bela<

Current thread:

/dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question., (continued)
- - /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. That Whispering Wolf... (Dec 02)
    - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. anthony baxter (Dec 03)
    - Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Robert M. Haas (Dec 03)
  - full disclosure list clarification Pete Hartman (Dec 02)
- pt_chmod carson () lehman com (Dec 02)
  - Re: pt_chmod Karl Strickland (Dec 02)
  - mktemp.. *Hobbit* (Dec 02)
- bugtraq list problems (resolved?) Admin/Support (Dec 02)
- full-disclosure list Pete Hartman (Dec 02)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Dec 03)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Bela Lubkin (Dec 03)
  - Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Karl Strickland (Dec 04)
    - Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Dec 04)
  - Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Dec 04)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Bela Lubkin (Dec 04)
  - Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Karl Strickland (Dec 04)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: smb () research att com (Dec 05)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Randy Bias (Dec 05)