funsec mailing list archives
Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:59:03 -0400
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:50:35 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
edge, and I can assure you it's in blocking mode. It's reduced the number of attacks we were seeing by over two thirds."Attacks" or "successful attacks"?
Attacks. Successful attacks are very few.
I'm sorry to heard that you're so bandwidth constrained that you were willing to pay for a TippingCow to save the 2/3 of unsuccessful attacks that it blocked. Unless you can point at enough "would otherwise have whacked a box" attacks that the TippingCow actually stopped that the cost of the Cow is less than the cost of cleaning up the blocked would-have-worked attacks, it's not buying you anything. And most of the time, the "would have worked" attacks are against some box that for some reason (covered well by Paul in another note) haven't been patched. Of course, most of *those* can be protected by a otherwised-surplus Dell GX110 running some linux-firewall-on-a-CD that only lets packets from approved sources in.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?, (continued)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Robert Edmonds (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Eduardo Tongson (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 11)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Barrie Dempster (Oct 13)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Roland Dobbins (Oct 13)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 13)
- lalala [was: Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?] Gadi Evron (Oct 11)
- Re: lalala [was: Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Roland Dobbins (Oct 11)