funsec mailing list archives
RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:52:01 -0500
SO, I have to go through the same filters that are in place today, but I
can pay to sidestep these if I want to. Which is basically me admitting that my message is Spam, and would be caught in your filters (which are getting better all the time IMO). I think some people are missing the point that they don't just take your money and wave you through like a toll booth. It's an accreditation service, and you have to make certain representations about your practices and your mail or they won't accredit you. E.g. they won't take your money in order to let you send 419 scams. Obviously it's Goodmail's customers who will pay the price for this because it amounts to a new marketing cost for those companies, but there's no reason to believe it will result in any extra spam or cost for users. AOL and Yahoo have just outsourced their whitelist. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 09)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Tom Van Vleck (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Dude VanWinkle (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 07)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail der Mouse (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Stephen J. Smoogen (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Stephen J. Smoogen (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Vicky Røde (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Bill Weiss (Feb 07)