Re: Fwd: Re: knife ban going to work?

[Marcos Agüero <maguero () s21sec com>]

Brian Loe escribió:
> ROTFLMAO!!! THANK YOU - you just made my point. Buckets CAN be
> dangerous but they make it easier to carry water so you don't ban
> them. Guns CAN be dangerous but they make it easier to defend yourself
> SO YOU DON'T BAN THEM.
The diference is that a gun is designed to kill people (not to defend
people!) while a bucket is designed to carry water. You can't compare
both things and conclude that what is true for one of is true for the other.
A gun makes easier to kill people and you what your are saying is that
kill people is a way to defend yourself, aren't you? A kevlar vest is
designed to defend people, and is a lot more efective than a gun. How
much people does kevlar vests kill in a year? And guns? What is the dead
 /live ratio while using them? So, which "tool" is for defend and which
is for kill?
I think that if you want to live longer, you must switch your gun with a
kevlar vest, and make other people to do the same. The less guns in the
street, the less bullets flying towards you, and the less need to
defend. Just take a look at statistics on countries with guns ban.
The guns don't kill, the people who use them are the real killers, so
why should we give them a perfect tool to kill?
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.