Re: Canadian revolution

["Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>]

On 10/24/06, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:

> Look - what you're calling "evidence" wouldn't be admissible in a
> scientific paper, wouldn't be admissible in a court of law, and would only
> be admissible in a church.
>
> Don't you think that tells you something?

Tells me something, tells me he can believe - take that leap - in
something bigger than himself, something you are apparently incapable
of, or more likely incapable of admitting to.

Whether that something bigger is the emotion you feel when you are
with loved ones, in prayer or at the pub. There are lots of things
"bigger" than you, and most all of them defy definition. You can write
a scientific paper about it, if you were that kind of bore, but you'll
only succeed in boiling out all of those emotions and feelings,
leaving your audience with a bunch of gobbledygook about chemicals
produced by the body and released into the blood stream. In other
words, they'll have no idea what the hell it is you're talking about.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.