funsec mailing list archives

Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case


From: "Daniel H. Renner" <dan () losangelescomputerhelp com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:04:53 -0800

Randy,

While I agree with there being no need to dreg up the jurors details, and with the incompetence of the judge, cop & DA...

The jurors DID have data as noted in Richard M. Smiths article:

"According to the trial transcript, Amero testified that she made every
attempt to keep the children from seeing the images. In fact, a number of children at the trial testified that she had attempted to block them from seeing the screen. Also, another substitute teacher testified that Julie had asked for help in the teachers lounge."

"At the trial Amero testified that she didn't, in fact, know how to turn a computer on or off." - hm...

"Actually, the defense expert at the trial testified that the sites visited were from pop-ups."


Sincerely,

Daniel H. Renner
President
Los Angeles Computerhelp
A division of Computerhelp, Inc.
818-352-8700"
http://losangelescomputerhelp.com



Randy Abrams wrote:
It not worth anything. It's petty and stupid... Big deal you can find
the juror. The juror doesn't make the sentence.

The juror can hardly be blamed for an incompetent judge, an even more
incompetent cop, and a DA who refuses to uphold his oath to pursue
justice.

Due to an either corrupt or mid-bogglingly ignorant combination of
Judge, Cop (Lounsbury), DA, and even defense attorney the jury had to
decide with fabricated information.

It's just petty to dig up and post the guy's details here.

You degrade yourself.

Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of eliza
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:09 PM
To: dan () losangelescomputerhelp com; rms () computerbytesman com
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [funsec] Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case

for what it is worth....

http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/f/o/x/Fred-S-Fox/index.html

On 2/15/07, Daniel H. Renner <dan () losangelescomputerhelp com> wrote:
People ranting insanely will accuse others of what they themselves have done. Proof?

Who originated the SBA?

And how many times has that company been in the courts for
piracy? 35 or so?
And the RIAA? How many people have they infected from their little P2P servers while they scream "pirates!"? (Not that I believe in pirating...)

A quiet township that attacks others in a malicious manner is a township afraid their own faults will be found out.

And yes, 40 years for that "crime" is nothing short of
malicious and evil.

Sincerely,

Daniel H. Renner
President
Los Angeles Computerhelp
A division of Computerhelp, Inc.
818-352-8700
http://losangelescomputerhelp.com


Attachment: dan.vcf
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Current thread: