funsec mailing list archives
RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case
From: "Randy Abrams" <abrams () eset com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:21:01 -0800
The Juror was presented with an "expert witness" by the name of Mark Lounsbury who either lied or was grossly ignorant and told them that the evidence proved that Amero physically clicked on the links. The judge would only allow the defense expert, the only person in the room who was an expert, to show 2 slides, rather than a live demonstration. The jurors had a very, very distorted view of the facts. The judge did her best to prevent a balanced testimony from being entered. The very slight glimpse the jury had of the truth was but a molecule in the cloud of false testimony provided by a person the prosecution presented to the jury as an expert. The jurors almost certainly had never heard of "Jury Nullification." The jurors were deliberately kept ignorant. You can't really fault them here. http://eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=42 Can a Legal System Unversed in Technology Result in a Fair Trial? http://eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=43 More on the Norwich Witch Hunt Also, an audio discussion http://www.eset.com/podcasts/index.php Perverted Justice - The Case of Julie Amero Cheers, Randy
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel H. Renner [mailto:dan () losangelescomputerhelp com] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 8:05 AM To: Randy Abrams Cc: eliza; rms () computerbytesman com; funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy, While I agree with there being no need to dreg up the jurors details, and with the incompetence of the judge, cop & DA... The jurors DID have data as noted in Richard M. Smiths article: "According to the trial transcript, Amero testified that she made every attempt to keep the children from seeing the images. In fact, a number of children at the trial testified that she had attempted to block them from seeing the screen. Also, another substitute teacher testified that Julie had asked for help in the teachers lounge." "At the trial Amero testified that she didn't, in fact, know how to turn a computer on or off." - hm... "Actually, the defense expert at the trial testified that the sites visited were from pop-ups." Sincerely, Daniel H. Renner President Los Angeles Computerhelp A division of Computerhelp, Inc. 818-352-8700" http://losangelescomputerhelp.com Randy Abrams wrote:It not worth anything. It's petty and stupid... Big dealyou can findthe juror. The juror doesn't make the sentence. The juror can hardly be blamed for an incompetent judge, aneven moreincompetent cop, and a DA who refuses to uphold his oath to pursue justice. Due to an either corrupt or mid-bogglingly ignorant combination of Judge, Cop (Lounsbury), DA, and even defense attorney thejury had todecide with fabricated information. It's just petty to dig up and post the guy's details here. You degrade yourself. Randy-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of eliza Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:09 PM To: dan () losangelescomputerhelp com; rms () computerbytesman com Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case for what it is worth....http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/f/o/x/Fred-S-Fox/index.htmlOn 2/15/07, Daniel H. Renner<dan () losangelescomputerhelp com> wrote:People ranting insanely will accuse others of what theythemselveshave done. Proof? Who originated the SBA? And how many times has that company been in the courts forpiracy? 35 or so?And the RIAA? How many people have they infected fromtheir littleP2P servers while they scream "pirates!"? (Not that I believe in pirating...) A quiet township that attacks others in a malicious manner is a township afraid their own faults will be found out. And yes, 40 years for that "crime" is nothing short ofmalicious and evil.Sincerely, Daniel H. Renner President Los Angeles Computerhelp A division of Computerhelp, Inc. 818-352-8700 http://losangelescomputerhelp.com
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case, (continued)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 15)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 15)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 15)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 15)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 15)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Gadi Evron (Feb 15)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 16)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 16)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 15)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Gadi Evron (Feb 15)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Daniel H. Renner (Feb 16)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 16)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Daniel H. Renner (Feb 16)
- RE: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 16)
- Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Brian Loe (Feb 16)
- Re: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Gadi Evron (Feb 15)
- Re: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 15)
- RE: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Randy Abrams (Feb 16)
- RE: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case Gadi Evron (Feb 16)
- RE: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case William Lefkovics (Feb 17)
- Re: FW: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case eliza (Feb 16)