funsec mailing list archives
Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy
From: der Mouse <mouse () rodents-montreal org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
If a hypothetical outside observer were looking at our planet, trying to pick a species whose elimination would most benefit the planet and (the rest of) its inhabitants, I'd have trouble seeing how to justify any choice other than Homo sapiens sapiens. At least I certainly hope such an outside observer is hypotheical; I_am_ human myself. :-/Won't THEY be surprised when our nuclear plants explode, and our chemical storage units start venting waste.
Depends on how our putative elimination is handled. I can imagine everything from just blink, one moment everything's going as normal, the next every human is dead, all the way to something like humanity's fertility rate falling to the point where despite our best efforts each person produces, on average, < 2 children per lifetime, and lets our population decay down to zero. Even the former I don't think would be that disastrous. Even if our chemical plants break down and vent stuff, even if our nuclear plants _did_ go critical (which I consider unlikely; they are designed to fail in the other direction), I think the planet could deal with the one-time hit. Might be disruptive, but probably not as much so as the late Cretaceous extinction event. It's the _continued_ dumping of assorted crap into the world around us that's so problematic.
Eliminating humans = destroying the planet.
I don't think so. We couldn't destroy the planet if we tried. We might be able to sterilize the ecosystem on the surface, but even that would be hard. (We could, fairly easily, kill off major fractions of the large creatures on the surface; this is a long way from sterilizing it and a long _long_ way from destroying it. See http://qntm.org/?destroy for more.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse () rodents-montreal org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy, (continued)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Nick FitzGerald (Jul 21)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Gadi Evron (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Paul M. Moriarty (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Gadi Evron (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Gadi Evron (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy der Mouse (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 22)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy der Mouse (Jul 23)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Ron (Jul 23)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy der Mouse (Jul 23)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy chris (Jul 24)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy phester (Jul 24)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy der Mouse (Jul 24)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy Anton Chuvakin (Jul 23)
- Re: population controls and the Paul Holdren controversy chris (Jul 24)