funsec mailing list archives
Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!
From: Amrit Williams <johndoe321 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:53:26 -0800
< --- Glass of wine and some popcorn btw - on the plane from NY to Chicago I sat next to a group of "climate scientists" that were arguing the relative security of various forms of scripting languages and web frameworks, my ears perked when one of them said he was working on erection management, which after a sigh was followed by I mean the ruby template engine called erector, I was amused until the other one mentioned blow fish and meant it literally. If a penguin farts while being held affectionately by Brett Michaels from Poison does Bruce Schneir still blog about squids on Friday? On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Robert Graham <robert_david_graham () yahoo com
wrote:
No, I'm simply exasperated at (1) the gross stupidity of supposedly-intelligent people, and at (2) the unbelievable arrogance of the unintelligent and/or uneducated who have absolutely no clue, yet have the audacity to pretend otherwise.Irony. Lulz.Can you -- generic you -- right here, right now, without any help, state the three laws of thermodynamics, give an example of a perturbation function, explain the carbon dioxide phase diagram, and solve a partial differential equation? If not, then you really should not be trying to express an opinion on global warming.I understand all your buzzwords. You are choosing random jargon to intimidate people. I'm not impressed. If Al Gore is getting Oscars and Nobel Prizes, then the only qualification you need to join the debate is to understand science at least as well as Al Gore. That's pretty much everybody. I would suggest that understanding the "scientific method" is important. That, for me, is what made me a skeptic (and what encouraged me to learn climatology). The IPCC has gaping holes in their scientific method. The worst is the way computer models have replaced empirical data. The second worst is the way that historical reconstructions (aka. the Hockey Sticks) are not reproducible, not statistically robust, and which contain "tricks to hide the decline". The IPCC, and scientists like Mann and Jones, do things openly and publicly that no other scientific discipline would tolerate. The Climategate e-mails don't really show anything new, but have focused people's attention on these errors. I'll bet money that the next IPCC assessment report will not contain a graph that "hides the decline" like the current one does. I'll give you a chance to make me look like a fool. I'm scratching my head about your "CO2 phase change diagram" buzzword. The partial pressure of CO2 never gets high enough to deposit out of the atmosphere, and I don't think there are lakes of CO2 under the ocean (where in theory, pressure is high enough to make CO2 a solid/liquid). I'm at a loss to explain why this has relevance to the IPCC conclusion that mankind is responsible for global warming. Please enlighten me, and show everyone how little I know of climate science. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!, (continued)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Gadi Evron (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Gadi Evron (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Alex Eckelberry (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Rich Kulawiec (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Robert Graham (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Amrit Williams (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Martin Tomasek (Dec 03)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Wes Deviers (Dec 03)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 05)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Martin Tomasek (Dec 05)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Martin Tomasek (Dec 03)
- PayPal Admits to Phishing!!! Randy Abrams (Dec 03)