funsec mailing list archives
Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:07:27 -0500
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:51:29 +0200, Gadi Evron said:
I am with you, vaccines risks are rare and unlikely, but they do exist. Risk data available online is only there to either debunk it, or is written by kooks. Real data doesn't exist.
So I took it as a challenge. 2 minutes and 37 seconds finds: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety.htm and a few seconds more finds: http://vaers.hhs.gov/resources/2009H1N1Summary_Nov25.pdf (short cut-n-paste, full report 4 pages) VAERS Summary: * As of November 20, 2009, 46 million doses of 2009 H1N1 vaccine had been shipped to vaccination providers in the United States. * As of November 20, 2009, VAERS had received 3182 adverse event reports following 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccination. * The vast majority (94%) of adverse events reported to VAERS after receiving the 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccine have not been serious (e.g., they encompass things like soreness at the vaccine injection site). * Of the 3182 reports, 177 (6%) were reports that involved what would be considered serious health events (defined as life threatening or resulting in death, major disability, abnormal conditions at birth, hospitalization, or extension of an existing hospitalization)*. * The percentage of reports involving what would be considered serious health events is not different between 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccines. Additionally, no new or unusual events or pattern of adverse events have emerged. VAERS reports continue to be monitored as more vaccine is administered. * Among the 177 reports of serious health events, there were 11 reports of death. OK. You tell me. Is CDC and HHS debunking or written by kooks?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread, (continued)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread seclists (Nov 29)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Martin Tomasek (Dec 01)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Larry Seltzer (Dec 01)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Vincent Hoffman (Dec 21)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Alex Eckelberry (Dec 21)
- finally! Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Gadi Evron (Nov 27)
- Re: finally! Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Larry Seltzer (Nov 27)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Robert Graham (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Gadi Evron (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Gadi Evron (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Alex Eckelberry (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Rich Kulawiec (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Robert Graham (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Amrit Williams (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Martin Tomasek (Dec 03)