RE: Hey old people

[Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>]

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Larry Seltzer wrote:

> > > So presumably LINK.EXE also first appeared in DOS 2.0 (or a later
> version)?
>
> Certainly that's true if I'm right, notwithstanding the possibility of a

See my previous post. There were .exe files on Dos 1 diskettes.

> LINK.COM for DOS 1.x. Would a linker be useful for .COM files at all? It
> might be if it supported overlays, but I'm sure the overlaying linker was a
> much later phenomenon. 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.