Re: Shocker: Bush Defends Spying After NSA Database Report

[James Kehl <shykta () dione ids pl>]

On Thu, 11 May 2006, Brian Loe wrote:

> So at best it was a stereotypical statement/aspersion for the purpose
> of...? His statement isn't true regardless because you'd be hard
> pressed to find a passage stating there are "no innocents". It may be
> an interpretation, but that will depend on the individual (or should,
> IMO).
So, what do you interpret "Let he he amongst you who is without sin cast
the first stone" to mean?

If I wanted to be really provocative, I'd ask how you interpreted the fact
that the person saying it didn't throw any stones either... but then I'd
be throwing stones in a sense :)

Sorry for OTness.

James
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.