funsec mailing list archives
RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up?
From: "StyleWar" <stylewar () cox net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:45:35 -0500
You're not missing anything that a study of the effects of tinfoil on the brain won't demystify.
-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Jerry Hill Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:13 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? On 5/15/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:Having worked for a teclo for several years myself(Sprint), I thinkit is entirely possible. And probable. Given this administrations penchant for sidestepping legal process under the guise of executive priviledge, I wouldn't be surprised at all. There is corruption, deceit, and lies at every stepalong the waywithin this administration. And that's not just me bashing anyone -- it turns up in indictments every day or so.I must be missing something. Why in the world would a federal prosecutor in a high profile case use extra-legal means to obtain evidence when there is a perfectly good legal channel to go through? It seems to me that information obtained through the NSA's secret program is almost certainly unusable in court (because either the court will disallow it, or the NSA will object to the disclosure of the source of the information). I don't know anything about the legal climate in DC, but I know that I see enough subpoenas for call records come across my desk that the hurdle to obtain one can't be too high. -- Jerry _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up?, (continued)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? StyleWar (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Message not available
- Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)
- Re: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? StyleWar (May 15)