Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up?

["Jerry Hill" <malaclypse2 () gmail com>]

Sorry, I meant to send this to the list, but sent it only to Fergie instead.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jerry Hill <malaclypse2 () gmail com>
Date: May 15, 2006 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [funsec] RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors
Please S tand Up?
To: Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net>


On 5/15/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
> As Singel writes over on 27B Stroke 6:
> http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1480629

It seems quite unlikely to me that this is connected the the NSA
story.  I know from my personal experience working for a CLEC that
subpoenas for call records are fairly easy to obtain in conncetion
with an ongoing investigation.  I imagine it's actually easier for
police or prosecutors to get a subpoena than to gain access to data
collected by a (until recently) secret NSA spy program.

Besides, if there's any chance these records will be presented as
evidence in court, I'd imagine that the people involved would like to
make sure they are obtained in a legal manner, and not in a way that
will turn an already politically charged case into even more of a
circus.

--
Jerry

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.