funsec mailing list archives
Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:01:30 -0500 (CDT)
Erm, I think we agree dude. My point is, it is ALL about business, which is why we shouldn't let these ISP's tell us how to use our lines. Gadi. On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
On 7/6/06, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:He nailed down the subject into the point that matters: Business. It's about profit.BullShit, the net _can_ be all about profit, but it should be more than that. Humans currently turn everything people enjoy into a business, but the fact is business as usual(as it is here in the states at least) is bad for the continued development of an idea or service. Music is now a business, and its mostly schlock. Cars and gasoline are businesses, thats why all the trolleys were dismantled and also why the electric car was put on the shelf. Light bulbs are a business and thats why they burn out in a year, even though they are capable of lasting almost indefinitely. Energy is a business, thats why .... err you get the idea. If we let businesses do what businesses do, the Internet will become nothing but a big AOL landscape, full of schlock. The net was paid for partly by billions of taxpayer dollars in incentives (and student tuitions), Why should these monopolies (some of which were forcably dismanteled and are now buying each other up again [see at&t and bellsouth] be the only ones in control? Since you like the Tubes description so much, why not think of the Internet as a Subway system, which is paid for and maintained by the Government."The whole concept is [that] we should not go into this until someone shows there is something that's been done that really is a violation of that neutrality."I give it a max of 4 years before _proof_ of that comes out. Just wait till the short term memory of the american public drifts away, then alter your QoS and blame any service interruptions on "system failures". -JP
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Dude VanWinkle (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 07)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Gadi Evron (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 07)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Dude VanWinkle (Jul 07)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Drsolly (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Drsolly (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Gadi Evron (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Dude VanWinkle (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Gadi Evron (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Dude VanWinkle (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Blue Boar (Jul 06)